|
Pass E-News on to your friends and colleagues—it's free!
Subscribe to E-News!
Code 940
o=o=o=o=o=o=o
Need CEUs, TLC, R&R?
You need a Midwifery Today conference!
Join us in Philadelphia--The City of Motherly Love!
March 23-27, 2000
"Mainstreaming the Midwifery Model"
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/conf/Phili2000/Phili.htm
Student Discount: 30% off!
Group Discount: 10% off!
Details are in the program.
For your copy of the printed program, send your full name and postal
address to inquiries@midwiferytoday.com.
Please mention code 940.
~*~*~*~*~
Midwifery Today Retreat!
Join us on the Oregon Coast at the Sandcastle Inn near Waldport, July 28-30, 2000
www.midwiferytoday.com/conferences/Oregon2000
For more information or to register, email
inquiries@midwiferytoday.com
or call 1-800-743-0974.
~*~*~*~*~
New York 2000 International Conference September 6-10, 2000
"Celebrate Diversity! An International Midwifery Model"
Join us at our international conference in New York City at the Riverside Church
www.midwiferytoday.com/conferences/2000and.htm
Printed programs soon available! To receive your copy, send your name, postal
mailing address and phone number to admin@midwiferytoday.com
o=o=o
Get in the advertising groove with Midwifery Today E-News--reach thousands of subscribers!
NEW YEAR SPECIAL: $45.00/issue or $150/4 issue package.
Email ads@midwiferytoday.com
for more information. Give your business a New Year booster shot!
o=o=o
This issue of Midwifery Today E-News is sponsored by:
-Feminist Expo 2000
-Harcourt Health Sciences
-Placenta Book
-Waterbirth Website
Look for their ads below!
o=o=o=o=o=o
Send responses to newsletter items to
mtensubmit@midwiferytoday.com
o=o=o=o=o=o
In This Week's Issue:
1) Quote of the Week
2) The Art of Midwifery
3) News Flashes
4) Induction Merits Informed Consent in Alberta
5) More on Induction
6) Check It Out!
7) Questions of the Week
8) Question of the Week Responses
9) Switchboard
10) Classified Advertising
o=o=o=o=o=o
1) Quote of the Week: "The traditional midwife maintains the social fabric of
the community, gathering friends and family together for birth, and enables the
birthing mother to have her experience in the context of home and loved ones.
This reestablishes the global village, and puts birth back into the context of
oneness and love it was originally intended to have."
-Nan Koehler Solomon
o=o=o=o=o=o
2) The Art of Midwifery
Most postpartum hemorrhages are caused by the caregiver. Any massage of the
uterus before the placental delivery will almost ensure unnecessary bleeding.
In rare instances a hemorrhage may begin before the placenta is delivered. This
is not just an isolated gush or two of blood, but a steady stream. This is the
only time it is appropriate to massage the uterus-yet even then, it may worsen
matters. The best thing is to immediately administer an oxytocic and when the
uterus contracts, use the Brandt-Andrew maneuver to hasten the placental delivery.
Once the placenta is delivered or if bleeding continues without the placenta coming
out, massage and bimanual compression are employed.
-Valerie El Halta, Midwifery Today Issue 48
===
Midwifery Today Issue 48 is a mini-textbook
on hemorrhage. Order it by calling 1-800-743-0974. Regular price $10; mention code 940 and pay only $8.50
(plus shipping & handling). Offer good until March 10, 2000.
====
Share your midwifery arts with E-News readers! Send your favorite tricks to
mtensubmit@midwiferytoday.com
o=o=o=o=o=o
3) News Flashes
A study examined the association between method of infant feeding in the first
weeks after birth and glucose tolerance, plasma lipid profile, blood pressure
and body mass in adults aged 48-53. Subjects were born at term between November
1943 and February 1947 in a hospital in Amsterdam around the time of a severe
period of famine. For 625 subjects, information was available about infant feeding
at the time of discharge from hospital (average of 10.4 days after birth) and
at least one blood sample after an overnight fast. Subjects who had been bottle
fed had a higher mean 120 minute plasma glucose concentration after a standard
oral glucose tolerance test than those who were exclusively breastfed. They also
had a higher plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration, a
lower high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration, and a higher LDL/HDL
ration. Systolic blood pressure and body mass index were not affected by the method
of infant feeding. The study concluded that exclusive breastfeeding seems to have
a protective effect against some risk factors for cardiovascular disease in later
life.
-Arch Dis Child 2000; 82
=PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!=
Visit the multiple award-winning WATERBIRTH WEBSITE for the most complete waterbirth
information available on the net!
www.waterbirthinfo.com/
Includes a Photo Gallery, over 50 firsthand waterbirth stories from moms, dads
and waterbirth practitioners, a tutorial, information on great
products you can order, and lots more.
Special Offer to E-News readers: Enjoy a 10% discount on your purchase of the
"WATER BABY" video. Regular price is $59.95 + $7.50 p/h. Your discount price is
just $53.95 + p/h. Full ordering details are at
www.waterbirthinfo.com/materials.html
=THANK YOU!=
4) Induction Merits Informed Consent in Alberta
It was great news for Canadian women when on February 16 Robert A. Burns, MD,
Executive Director of the Alberta Medical Association announced that the AMA's
Alberta Clinical Practice Guideline for induction of labor will now include a
strong recommendation that informed consent take place before the procedure is
initiated.
This precedent setting move will give women across Alberta the ability to choose
whether to subject their baby to the risks and side effects that may be caused
by birth induction or perhaps to use a natural alternative, such as medical watching
and waiting. It has been reported that until now some women have been coerced
into agreeing to a birth induction without knowing risks, side effects, and alternatives
to forcing the birth of their child. Some doctors have also reported that some
women have asked to force their birth to get it over with or to coincide with
a husband's schedule.
Gail J. Dahl, Executive Director of the Canadian Childbirth Association
says the group has worked diligently over the past four years toward
creating informed consent for this elective procedure in Alberta. The
Association highly recommends that the new guidelines also include new research
evidencing longer gestation time for first-time mothers, up to 42 weeks and longer.
New research also shows that ultrasound tests used for gestational dating have
an error rating regardless of the trimester, with the largest error rating to
be shown in the last trimester.
Canada is not the safest country in the world in which to give birth, owing
in part to its high rate of induced birth, over 30% in some areas, which often
leads to unnecessary emergency cesareans.
Following is an excerpt of a letter from the Canadian Childbirth
Association director to Dr. Burns:
We believe this is a positive step forward in assuring safer childbirth in
the province of Alberta and we congratulate your Committee on Reproductive Care
and the Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Program for looking into this critical
area of informed consent on birth inductions.
The next step would be to create a sample informed consent for the
induction of labor which would include: risks to mother and baby, side
effects to mother and baby, alternatives, contraindications, (for instance
cytotec, which is increasingly used to induce birth, is stated by the
manufacturer to be contraindicated in pregnancy). Also appropriate warning and
precautions are shown in the patient inserts and the 1999 Canadian Pharmacists
Association Manual. I believe it is important to create this sample of informed
consent for birth induction as our Alberta physicians do not have this information
readily available for immediate use.
Your Guidelines need to state that gestation for a first-time mother is
longer, up to 42 weeks and longer and that accurate dating comes from the first
day of the last menstrual period. Ultrasound measurements in the first, second
and third trimester of birth carry an error rating on either
side of the date. Physicians using a forty-week due date for a first-time
mother and errors in gestational dating by ultrasound seem to be the cause of
untold numbers of premature babies being induced in Canada.
The increased cost to our healthcare and ever increasing health and birth complications
arising out of inducing premature babies in Alberta will certainly decrease once
your guidelines have been adjusted to include the above points.
-Gail Dahl press release
====
5) More on Induction
We have little evidence that modern postdates management offers benefits and
considerable evidence that it does not. Randomized trials of expectant management
versus routine induction show few or no significant differences in outcome. Attempts
to prevent postdate pregnancy by membrane stripping or nipple stimulation initiate
labor more frequently compared with controls, but studies present no data on delivery
route. Vaginal application of prostaglandin containing gel may ripen the cervix
but has little effect on cesarean rates. Macrosomia may be of concern because
of increased c-sections and birth injuries, but ultrasound predicts macrosomia
poorly (95% confidence intervals of +/- 20% with accuracy worst at extremes of
weight, and we have no evidence that induction improves outcomes. We do know that
performing cesareans for macrosomia does not decrease asphyxia or injury rates.
Paradoxically, treatment works best on those who need it least: induction is
most likely to succeed when the fetus is healthy and the mother on the verge of
starting labor on her own. The inverse also holds: treatment does least for those
who most need it. Whether the process has gone awry or the mother simply is not
as far along as her doctor thinks, if her body is not ready for labor, induction
will likely fail. When testing reveals a compromised fetus, doctors induce whether
the cervix is ready or not. Inducing an unripe cervix leads to long, hard labors,
yet a baby in trouble is least able to withstand the stress. Oligohydramnios,
a complication of postdates pregnancy, predisposes to abnormal fetal heart rate.
When it is found, obstetricians induce. Membranes will almost surely be ruptured
for one reason or another. Now the baby has no amniotic fluid.
We also have evidence that postdates management itself causes
complications, and, as with surveillance tests, this ironically reinforces
belief that postdatism is dangerous. Devoe and Sholl found that 30% of
fetuses testing normal developed fetal distress when labor was electively induced,
and the cesarean rate was 15% versus 2% for spontaneous labor. Ahlden et al. found
that the most likely scenario to end in an infected baby was an overdue mother
who was induced, had an amniotomy, internal electronic fetal monitoring, many
vaginal exams, and whose labor ended in cesarean section. That so many healthy
women carrying healthy term fetuses had cesareans for fetal distress says more
about management than the dangers of 41-week gestations.
-Henci Goer, Obstetric Myths versus research Realities Bergin & Garvey 1995
Devoe LD and Sholl JS. Postdates pregnancy. Assessment of fetal risk and obstetric
management. J Reprod Med 1983;28(9).
Ahlden S et al. Prediction of sepsis neonatorum following a full-term
pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988;70(1).
=PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!=
On March 31-April 2, 2000, at the Baltimore Convention Center in Baltimore,
Maryland, the Feminist Majority Foundation and over 400 co-sponsors from all over
the US and around the world, including renowned feminist leaders, politicians,
scholars, authors, activists, celebrities and entertainers, will host FEMINIST
EXPO 2000 FOR WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT to share strategies and fuel the women's movement,
its ideas and vision for the future.
Register online at www.feminist.org
or call 703-522-2214.
=THANK YOU!=
6) Check It Out!
~~~WWW.MIDWIFERYTODAY.COM~~~
A Web Site Update for E-News Readers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This week we turned our website into a fully functional cornucopia of birth
information. Please visit us! www.midwiferytoday.com
It's now easier than ever to find your way around our site! Please take a
look, but keep in mind that it is still under construction. Our special
thanks to Chrystal Otto, our webmistress, who has spent every waking moment working
on our web page since she joined the Midwifery Today staff. You Rock, Momma-Mistress!
~~~~~~~~~
The newest article on the web site is
Technology in Birth: First Do No Harm
by Marsden Wagner. M.D.
From our upcoming book "Toward Better Birth: Twenty Things You Need to Know" Please
send your email address to
Towardbetterbirth@midwiferytoday.com
if you are interested in being notified when it is off the press. Lead time is approximately 9 months.
IMPORTANT: This is an automated system. Please do not include questions or any
information other than your email address.
~~~~~~~~~
Our Web gURLs can design a Storefront shop space for you for a small fee. This
would create an elaborate full-page web ad for those of you who don't have a web
site! The Storefront is also a great way to add to the web space you already have!
Get your product on the Internet and into the e commerce traffic! It's also
a great way to have a URL (Internet address) to display photographs of your products
or services.
Get up to date with your marketing! This is perfect for small businesses
with special needs, yet inexpensive enough for the individual to afford.
All you need is a few photographs and a nice smile!!
For more information, contact Cynthia at
netads@midwiferytoday.com
or call 1-800-743-0974.
~~~~~~~~~
We are currently accepting bids for sponsorship of our International
Conference in New York, September 2000! Contact Cynthia at
netads@midwiferytoday.com
~~~~~~~~~
Would you like to sell your product at the Midwifery Today conference in
Philadelphia? Elise would love to explain what advertisement options are available.
Email: ads@midwiferytoday.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
7) Questions of the Week
I would like to have my fourth baby at home with a midwife, supported by
close family. My only hesitation is that my third birth was precipitous. My
water broke as a first sign of labor at 11:30 a.m. After having had 2 or 3
mild-moderate contractions in the car, I arrived at the center at 1:00. The midwife
noted I had arrived prior to labor because of GBS--for antibiotic shot. I had
the urge to push at 1:25 and was holding a 10 lb. baby in my arms by 1:45.
I disagree with induction, but am determined to have a wonderful birth
experience where I am surrounded by people who will support me. There is the chance
that my midwife (not to mention my husband and doula) could get stuck in traffic.
What would you recommend for a mom in my position?
====
(Repeated): I would like to hear from other midwives who have dealt with women
who have pinworms in pregnancy. Did the women experience periodic spotting? Also
what, if any, natural remedies are effective and safe in pregnancy?
-Deren Bader, CPM, MPH
====
Send your responses to mtensubmit@midwiferytoday.com
o=o=o=o=o=o
=PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!=
$45 Publisher's On-Line Special
"The Placenta: To Know Me Is To Love Me: A reference guide for gross
placental examination."
This comprehensive guide provides succinct clinical-pathological
correlations based upon indications for placental examination and the
answers to many of your clinical and pathological questions.
Check out www.netins.net/showcase/placenta
for detailed book information and ordering information.
=THANK YOU!=
=PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!=
Your source for up to date information for today's midwife!
From prenatal care to postpartum care needs of the mother/child and
family, Harcourt Health Sciences is your PREMIER source for all of the
latest midwifery information. W.B. Saunders, Mosby, and Churchill Livingstone
are all part of Harcout Health Sciences-a team of leading publishers dedicated to meeting the
information needs of health professionals.
www.wbsaunders.com/
=THANK YOU!=
8) Question of the Week Responses
Q: Could anyone provide information on herpes and vaginal birth vs.
c-section? A client is considering opting for a c-section rather than risk
the possibility of transmitting it to her newborn (She is currently at 27
weeks). Any suggestions or information/resources would be appreciated.
-Anon.
My first experience with the issue of vaginal herpes outbreak (subsequent, not
primary) just prior to delivery was my own birth. I was attended by an OB/GYN
and had a hospital birth. I was afraid to tell him that I thought I was starting
to get an outbreak, but with all the risks I'd heard about, I knew I had to. The
day before I went into labor, I showed him the blister during an exam and he told
me it was small enough and far enough away from the birth canal, that he could
just cover the area with a 4x4 pad during the delivery. The blister was inside
the labia majora near the clitoris. I was very relieved! I had a vaginal birth
the next day.
The second time I encountered the situation was with a client who had
contracted herpes many years previous. She had one outbreak around 22 weeks and
she too was very worried. She was aware of what foods and stressors triggered
her outbreak and avoided them, but ended up having another at 39 weeks. I called
a family physician (who delivered babies) at the clinic in the woman's town to
ask if the woman could have an internal culture done to rule out an internal lesion.
He told me that internal lesions nearly always ONLY occur with INITIAL outbreaks,
and the risk of internal lesions with subsequent outbreaks (especially if she's
had herpes for several years) is miniscule. He told me that if the lesion is not
on the perineum, she could deliver vaginally virtually without risk. I was a little
surprised, as this contradicted a lot of the information I had read about the
seriousness and fear of herpes and vaginal birth.
Finally, just recently, I had a client who (as she had done with her last
pregnancy with a CNM) decided to take a viral suppressant beginning at 38 weeks.
-Paula Bernini
====
While I can't recall the source of the information, I remember reading a
while back of midwives administering superglue during labor over the herpes lesions
to prevent transmission from mother to baby. It's worth looking into.
~Amy Jones
====
My question is how often is this woman having outbreaks? Also, did she have
her first outbreak during this pregnancy or is she just having secondary outbreaks?
If she is having secondary outbreaks, then perhaps a change in stress levels,
diet, exercise could help her have less outbreaks. If all else fails and she is
having frequent outbreaks I would offer to put her on Acyclovir, oral, for her
last trimester, thus avoiding an outbreak at term.
-Annette Manant CNM
====
Order the Midwifery Today conference tape "Herpes" (Item No. 941T79). Andrea
Dixon discusses symptoms, how to help infected women avoid outbreaks, and what
conditions may activate the virus. Regular price $9; E-News special $7.50 (plus
shipping & handling) when you mention Code 940.
Call 1-800-743-0974 to order. Offer good through March 17.
o=o=o=o=o=o
9) Switchboard
Editor's Note: the case involving breastfeeding mom Siri Wright has been dismissed
as of this writing. Below is a synopsis of the case, which drew worldwide attention
via email in a matter of days. This is grassroots activism at its best. Congratulations
to all those who helped Siri stand up for the right to breastfeed her child for
as long as she knows is appropriate. Consider letting your thoughts on this subject
be known via the avenues listed below.
Siri Wright, mother of two ages 4 and 2, was assigned a trial date because she
is still breastfeeding her daughter. She was summoned for jury duty, but Idaho
law dismisses mothers of duty if they are nursing a child. Siri called to arrange
dismissal and through a course of events that you can read in more detail at www.leftgrlls.com/supportsiri/
was given four months to end her nursing relationship. She explained that this
was not possible and then was given two days notice to serve jury duty. Siri has
no family in state, no childcare options, and her husband works far from home;
so to comply with the notice, she appeared in court with her children. A tirade
ensued by one of the court officials and Siri was notified of a coming trial date
to settle the issue.
-Alyssa
====
I can't thank you enough for all your supportive emails. The response has been
overwhelming. Our story was featured on two local newscasts that we hope will
spread our story even farther. My attorney has set up a web page where you can
access the latest information on my case:
www.seinigerlaw.com/wright
The site also contains a forum where you can post your messages to me. It would
be better to contact us through this forum rather than direct email. The volume
of mail has been overwhelming, and I can't even begin to respond individually.
Also, our attorney would like a record of every response, and this forum is the
best way to do that. Even if you've already emailed me, it would be great if you
could post what you sent on the forum.
www.seiningerlaw.com/forum
-Siri Wright
Other actions that would continue to be helpful are:
*Letters to the editor of our local paper, The Idaho Statesman. Letters
should be up to 200 words in length.
Email: editorial@boise.gannett.com
Fax (208) 377-6449
Postal mail: Box 40
Boise ID 83707 USA
Please sign your letter and include your mailing address and a daytime
telephone number.
*Contact the governor or First Lady. Governor Kempthorne's pet program is
"The Generation of the Child." He has promised to make life for Idaho's
children better than ever. Please include the words "Generation of the
Child" in the subject line of your email, as this will encourage his
attention more than anything else.
www.state.id.us/gov/correspondence.htm
email:governor@gov.state.id.us
postal mail: Office of the Governor, 700 W. Jefferson, 2nd Flr. PO Box 83720, Boise, Idaho 83720-0034 USA
Fax 208-334-2175
Patricia Kempthorne's email: 1stlady@gov.state.id.us
====
Several months ago you posted my question about how to find support for a VBAC
homebirth. I was debating whether or not to attempt a homebirth given I could
not find one OB or midwife in the Philadelphia area to support me. I want to thank
you for posting my letter which resulted in a handful of enthusiastic supporters.
In addition, just reading your newsletter every Friday reinforced my own
intuitive feelings about how I wanted to birth. You helped me find the
right resources and develop the right mindset to be successful.
Charles Nicholas Henry was born at home on February 3 (9 days late!) at 8:47
in the morning. I pushed him out with the help of my excellent
midwife, her nurse, two of my best friends, my husband and my 2-1/2 year old son.
It was simultaneously the hardest and most wonderful moment of my life.
-Stephanie Kindt
===
Our birthing unit is contemplating a change to the timing of the first baby
bath. Currently it is performed in the birthing suite within the first
couple of hours. We have heard, however, that it is better for vitamin K
synthesis to delay until the next day. Your thoughts on this or referral to
any studies would be appreciated.
-Jacinta Muller
====
A client has had a natural birth, then two c-sections. She had a broad
ligament tear during the last section which is why they are saying she has to
have another cesarean. She birthed her last 8 months ago and is now 8 weeks pregnant.
She is 38 and lives in an isolated community with little support. She is very
keen for information and has asked me to gather as much as I can in regard to
her choices (elective c-section vs VBAC attempt).
Any feedback/experience with/about this medical condition would be
appreciated. I've been searching medical books and finding no specific
references either to it or to the preferred action for future pregnancies
and births in the presence of a torn broad ligament.
-Jackie Mawson
====
In response to the question about twins and ultrasound [Issue 2:8]: The
only good reason I know of for extra ultrasounds for a twin gestation is to
check that the growth remains concordant. Tertiary centers have procedures for
correcting discordant growth which do have their risks but which can make significant
differences for both children if successful. But all such procedures (and the
ultrasounds) should be the decision of the parents after informed consent. It
does not sound as if the woman in question has been told a thing.
-Cynthia Flynn
====
This article lists several studies on animal fetuses. Perhaps it will be of
some help: www.drgreene.com/970106.html
-Laine Holman
====
In the early 1990s a large study carried out in Perth, Western Australia,
called the Raine study, looked at the effect of having multiple ultrasounds in
pregnancy. As I best recall, there was a link to having slightly smaller babies
(but only about 30g) and an increased risk of having IUGR babies when multiple
u/s where done. I don't know where you could get a hold of it, but if you went
to a Medline search and looked for the Raine Study you should be able to find
it.
-Kirsten Blacker
====
I am a mother of three children, all born at home. I had no ultrasound for
my first and my third children, but had several ultrasounds performed with my
second. While the two not exposed are generally mellow, agreeable, and "easy"
and always have been, the second child has always been a real challenge! She is
more physically active, emotionally unstable and difficult to guide, nurture,
and keep safe.
Am I crazy to think this difference might be related to the ultrasound? Is
there any place I can learn more about the negative side effects of
ultrasound and what can be done if there was damage caused? I know that individual
children are different and have different natures without cause or reason, but
could there be anything to my concerns? Please let me know if you know of resourses
or information for me in my quest to understand how best to parent my little girl.
-Lisa Vaughn
Reply to: lisandchris@uswest.net
====
In response to Cindy S's comments in Issue 2:8:
First, regarding the breastfeeding remark, I have the following
correspondence from Dr. Watters, dating from Jan 9, 1998: "I wholly support any
efforts to make breastfeeding as easy and accepted as it should be....anywhere
and anytime the infant needs it. Phil Watters (Obstetrician & Gynaecologist)"
This seems pretty supportive of breastfeeding to me!
Second, I think it needs to be considered that since Dr. Watters subscribes
to E-News (and also to my own birth activist newsletter, the Online Birth Center
News, birth@moonlily.com), he's probably
not a typical ob-gyn and is at least open to new ways of looking at the birth
process. We women are rightfully angry about the ways the medical establishment
has hurt us, historically, generally, and personally BUT you don't change peeople's
minds about things by yelling at them and suggesting how wrong they are.
When we find an ob who IS supportive of midwives, breastfeeding and so on, even
though he or she may be more medically minded than we'd like, it's better to cultivate
the relationship and try to gently show them our view on things (with references
and studies to back it up, when appropriate and possible), rather than possibly
alienating them by direct attacks.
I don't mean we should bend over backward to be nice, but why antagonize an
ally or possible ally?
-Donna Dolezal Zelzer
====
In response to turning a breech [Issue 2:8]:
I agree with Maka that breech is a variation of normal birth and sometimes a
baby presents breech for good reasons. I provided a detailed outline of methods
to turn a breech, both non-invasive and medical, to answer an inquiry about how
breeches were turned. It was meant to inform and did not include personal opinions
about preferred methods or the option to simply have a vaginal breech delivery.
It is true that midwives are guardians of normal birth and sometimes that
includes breech delivery. My own third child was delivered frank breech
after I refused a c-section (a big deal 19 years ago). She chose that
position because of a marginal placenta and a double nuchal cord wrap. An external
version, had it been attempted, probably would have failed.
I have since attended breech births. However, I have also done external
versions when less aggressive methods have failed. It is wise, when making a judgment
call, to take into account the level of experience the midwife has with breech
delivery, the legal and medical climate in your area and any limitations a midwifery
license may impose. In my area, a licensed midwife is not allowed to deliver a
woman out of hospital if the baby is diagnosed as a breech before labor. When
I compare the number of medical interventions that a woman would face in the hospital
with the intervention of an attempted external version, it seems reasonable to
try the version. If it fails, at least there are compassionate and experienced
physicians in my area who will do a vaginal breech delivery. Some areas are not
so fortunate to have this option and the midwife will then be faced with her natural
instincts to protect the mother and baby by attending a breech birth. That is
why it is important to have midwives who are well experienced in breech delivery.
Routine cesarean for breech presentation is medical abuse, especially a frank
breech in a multiparous mother.
Although I experienced my first surprise breech only three years ago, I
haven't had to perform an external version in nearly ten years. Babies tend to
turn on their own given a little room and mommy encouragement.
I hope this correspondence clears up any fears that midwives are promoting aggressive
medical attitudes toward breech babies. Joyfully, I find that the opposite seems
to be true.
-Maryl Smith
====
I cared for a primip last weekend who had an epidural and pushed for 45 minutes,
then refused to go on. She said she was exhausted and just
couldn't do it. The baby was at +1 station. She most definitely could have delivered
vaginally. We tried to convince her to go on, but she refused to push. Part of
the problem was stool in her rectum which we believe she was fearful of passing
with pushing correctly (which she still had not done). I encouraged the physician
to bolus her epidural (which at that point was not effective) and just let her
rest, in hopes that the baby would proceed down on her own. He refused since the
patient was insistent and he believed she would end up as a section anyway. As
a student nurse midwife, that was extraordinarily frustrating. Can anyone offer
suggestions on what else we may have tried to convince her to continue?
-Karen
====
Do most midwives regularly make use of the Doptone? Also, shouldn't each womon
be made fully aware that the Doptone is ultrasonic? Even though the exposure periods
are usually brief, I heard that 1 min. of Doptone is much stronger--equal to 30
min of the other full-image type ultrasound. Is this true?
Anon.
====
I am looking for stories and information about giving birth to twins. My
midwife is out of state, and doesn't feel she can guarantee she will be
here in time for the birth of my babies. With this in mind, I have been
contending with the hospital and setting out my guidelines and preferences. The
one that seems to be the largest issue is the use of an epidural. For obvious
reasons, I am not eager to go that route, but at the same time, would prefer it
to a c-section.
At this time, one baby is head down, and the other (the one to emerge last)
is breech. While the doctor will leave me without the epidural for a vertex birth,
she is eager to use an epidural for the breech birth. I'm
frustrated, but I also realize her experience is not equal to that of my
midwife. I am clear that the birth of my babies is not about what is
easiest for my OB, yet I need information that will help inform her about
the ways she can help me in my deliveries without the use of any form of
sedation.
Reply to: LisaLukKen@Aol.com
====
Unless otherwise noted, share your responses to Switchboard letters with E-News
readers! Send them to
mtensubmit@midwiferytoday.com.
If an email address is included with the letter, feel free to respond directly.
o=o=o=o=o=o
10) Classified Advertising
Need your article, thesis, essay or book edited and/or proofread? I have
worked with pregnancy, birth and midwifery related manuscripts for more than thirteen
years and know the field well. Sliding scale.
cherjm@aol.com
Disclaimer
This publication is presented by Midwifery Today, Inc., for the sole purpose of disseminating
general health information for public benefit. The information contained in or provided through
this publication is intended for general consumer understanding and education only and is not
intended to be, and is not provided as, a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
This publication and any information provided are not intended to constitute the practice
of, or furnishing of, medical, nursing or professional health care advice, diagnosis, consultation, treatment or services in any jurisdiction. Always seek the advice of your midwife, physician, nurse or other qualified health care provider before you undergo any treatment or for answers to any questions you may have regarding any medical condition.
Copyright Notice
The content of E-News is copyrighted by Midwifery Today, Inc., and, occasionally, other rights holders. You may forward E-News by e-mail an unlimited number of times, provided you do not alter the content in any way and that you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. You may print a single copy of each issue of E-News for your own personal, noncommercial use only, provided you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. Any other use of the content is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Midwifery Today, Inc., and any other applicable rights holders.
© 2000 Midwifery Today, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Midwifery Today: Each One Teach One! |