Second Stage: Cephalic Birth
The other method for applying gentle downward pressure on the baby's head is to apply one palm to the top of the baby's head, fingers pointing toward the baby's face and the other hand on the underside of the head, fingers pointing toward the baby's face. If the baby restituted facing the mother's right thigh, the right hand would be the top hand; if it restituted to the mother's left, the left hand would be on top. With this method, the fingers never come into contact with the fetal/newborn neck. This is the technique I recommend for beginners, although it is awkward unless you are standing to one side or the other of the mother's legs. When you are sitting between the mother's legs, it is necessary to shift your body in the opposite direction to which the baby restitutes so you can apply your hands properly.
Once the top shoulder impinges under the symphysis pubis, the next action is to draw the head and body upward toward the sky to birth the baby following the Curve of Carus. To securely hold the baby, your hands must support the head with the fingers spread open, applying support to both the head and the shoulders. The hands and wrists sandwich the baby's emerging body. All that is needed now is to place the baby on the mother's abdomen, cover and dry. The baby has safely been received into this world.
When receiving the head of a direct occiput posterior baby, the technique for flexing the head requires lifting and gently pushing upward on the emerging occiput (forehead). To place downward pressure at this time would deflex the head prematurely, causing the larger occiput frontal diameter to birth, possibly stretching or tearing the vaginal tissues. All other maneuvers would be similar to the occiput anterior delivery.
The best way to learn these techniques is to practice many, many times with a doll and pelvis or a similar model. This enables motor memory of the moves needed to catch a baby so when the time arrives for your first catch, your hands will have already learned the movements. The explanations given in this series appear lengthy, but in actuality the experience will go by much more quickly.
- Kimberly Hulsey, LM in The Birthkit Issue 29
Bargains & Specials!
Limited-time offers for E-News Readers
Save on Midwifery Today products and more! Take advantage of the savings in the Online Holiday Pack.
Interested in midwifery? Care about birth? Then you need Midwifery Today magazine.
Subscribe today and save $3 on a one-year subscription or renewal!
Just enter code 1923 when you check out.
This offer expires Oct 15, 2002 and is not good with any other offers.
Want to learn about birth in water?
Order Midwifery Today Issue 54 on waterbirth by Sept. 30, 2002 and save $3.
Just enter code 1915 when you check out.
Not good with any other offers.
Other Products and Services of Interest
CONFERENCE AUDIOTAPES FOR THIS WEEK'S THEME
INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MIDWIVES
Midwifery Today's Web-based organization that networks international midwives.
Forum Talk: Breech Birth
Have any doulas been with a woman during a breech birth? What was your experience and how did it differ from other births?
To share your thoughts and experience, go to Midwifery Today's Forums.
Geisinger Medical Center
Geisinger Medical Center is seeking two certified nurse-midwives to become part of an extremely successful program in a new state-of-the-art Womens Health Pavilion. Join two other midwives in providing individualized gynecological and prenatal care, hands-on assistance during labor and delivery, as well as annual exams and postpartum support. Our midwives are actively involved with education for residents, medical students and nursing students. AAE-M/F/D/V
Contact: Kathy Kardisco, Professional Staffing, Phone: 800.845.7112, Fax: 800.622.2515
Question of the Week: Herpes
Q: I have a client who has herpes. She hasn't had an outbreak for a year, but she is concerned that labor (pain and her fear around it) will trigger an outbreak and lead to a c-section. What are her options? How do I learn more as her doula? Is there anything she can do (herbs, visualizations, etc.) to lessen her chances of an outbreak while keeping the baby healthy?
Send your responses to email@example.com.
Question of the Week Responses: Thrombocytopenia
Q: Q: A mum is 18 weeks pregnant and has just been diagnosed with thrombocytopenia. This is extremely rare in pregnancy. The doctors wish to treat with steroids, which she does not want. If you have dealt with this condition in pregnancy, what was the outcome? What are her chances of avoiding more complications due to her low platelet count?
A: Thrombocytopenia was treated with regular platelet infusions to avoid any maternal and foetal difficulties. Outcome: healthy baby, happy mother.
A: I cared for a woman in conjunction with an obstetrician and haematologist with idiopathic thrombocytopaenia which developed in pregnancy. Her platelet count got as low as 60,000. She had no treatment because the haematologist's policy was that as long as she was symptom free—i.e., no bleeding or bruising—not to treat unless her platelet count fell below 50,000. Both the obstetrician and the haematologist were supportive of her having a homebirth and a physiological third stage, which she indeed went on to have.
A: Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura is just that—unknown cause for low platelets. I have followed many women with this condition. Most times it is not a problem. If the platelets stay above 100,000 I deliver out of hospital. If the platelet count goes below 100,000, the docs give steroids, and the count goes up and stays up. While theoretically the woman could develop bleeding, I have never seen it and most do really well without treatment.
- Lonnie, CNM, ND
A: One would have to know what the platelet count was. If it is below 50,000 then it would be very worrisome indeed. Some ladies develop an immune throbocytopaenia during pregnancy and it is usually benign. The patient should have her platelet count followed probably every two to three weeks. The size of the platelets is important as well as the shape of the red cells. I don't think that steroids would be necessary in all cases. It probably wouldn't hurt to involve a haematologist.
- Henry Mueller
A: Follow with platelet counts. Steroids probably aren't needed unless the count is 60,000 or less. Because there is a greater tendency to bleed, hospital birth probably is more prudent.
- Peg Browning, CNM
A: I am a nurse in labor and delivery and an aspiring midwife. Recently, a client was admitted for what was thought to be a normal and uncomplicated delivery. After her lab work was returned, it was discovered her platelet count was 5,000 and her white blood count was elevated. The mother delivered with no complications, no hemorrhage. In her previous vaginal deliveries, she had experienced retained placenta and hemorrhage. Unfortunately, she was diagnosed with acute cystoblastic leukemia. The baby had no difficulties with the birth transition and breastfed beautifully.
Editor's note: Responses to any Question of the Week may be sent to E-News at any time.
The BirthLove Web site has helped many women grow trust in birth and in their bodies. It has helped women resist Cytotec, find good midwives, and stop believing everything their doctors say. There are hundreds of homebirth stories: unassisted VBAC, fathers' stories, twin (and triplet home VBAC!) stories, breech stories—for things that people get sectioned for daily, there are homebirth stories on the site. Marsden Wagner, MD is a contributing expert, as are Sarah Buckley MD, Gloria Lemay and Gretchen Humphries. BirthLove has changed and saved lives through education, communication and love. Become a member of BirthLove today and be inspired!
Question of the Quarter, Midwifery Today print magazine
Issue 64, Unity
Is unity possible in this diverse midwifery community? Can we stand up for and support one another when there is such a range of philosophical approaches to training and practice?
Please submit your response by Sept. 30, 2002, to firstname.lastname@example.org.
All responses subject to editing for content and style. Sorry, but we cannot reply to each individual submission.
With Woman: Meconium
by Gloria Lemay, compiled by Leilah McCracken
Should Women be Induced to Prevent Meconium Staining?
The philosophy that women should be induced to prevent having a baby with meconium in the amniotic fluid ignores the possibility that the induction causes the passing of meconium. I have seen a lot of late babies in my career. We seem to grow them big and late up here in the Pacific Northwest, just like the trees. I very seldom see meconium in the amniotic fluid of 42-week plus babies.
I associate meconium in the amniotic fluid with smokers (dope or nicotine) in the few cases I do see. Every time a woman smokes a cigarette it has the same effect of putting a pillow over a baby's face. When the baby is getting mature it can evacuate the bowel as a response to oxygen deprivation. When we're scared, smothered or choked, we poop or have diarrhea as a defense. When they used to hang criminals by the neck, they knew that they would poop once the oxygen was cut off.
If there is meconium in the waters, the last thing to do is cut off the oxygen supply, which is exactly what happens in hospital in order to "help" the floppy, meconium-stained baby: The cord is cut immediately after birth. This forces the lungs to draw in the meconium that is really unsuctionable in the lungs (they can only go into the nose, mouth, and trachea). But if the cord is intact and the heart is pumping well, oxygen will keep circulating to the baby, and the baby will have a chance to cough, sputter, gag, phlegm up some gunk -- all the things we do automatically if we go face down in a mud puddle to clear our airways and lungs.
Meconium is not really a problem. It's a wake-up sign for the practitioner to watch for distress, but it's estimated that only 10% of the time it is distress. The other 90% of the time it means nothing. So, to induce thinking you're going to prevent is ridiculous.
Gloria is currently incarcerated for being a "midwife" in a Canadian province where "midwife" is a term owned and monopolized by the provincial government and their midwifery agents. To write to her, send letters (no stickers or other objects included, just paper and ink) to: Gloria Lemay, c/o 7900 Fraser Place Drive, Burnaby, BC V5J 5H1 Canada
To make a donation to her legal defense fund, please go to www.birthlove.com/gloria.html.
I talked to Gloria on the phone recently. Here is what she has to say about how she is doing:
"I am well and happy and with good people. I am using the opportunity to have a rest from being on my pager and being responsible for people's births. It warms my heart to know that my sister birth attendants in Vancouver are stepping into my role and doing a brilliant job. I am really focusing on areas of my life that I need to work on in order to be fit and healthy. When I get out of here, I'll be a better birth attendant than before."
While it is admirable that she is using her time behind bars in positive ways, the fact that she is there at all is a grave insult to caring, gentle people everywhere. We must appeal this sentence. If left without appealing, this case will color how women in BC and beyond are forced to give birth, severely limiting choice and freedom. Homebirth attendants will be brought before the courts for as little as keeping a box of gloves in their birth bags, and women will be forced to choose attendants and birth places they instinctively resist, leading to unnecessary interventions and pain. The implications of this case are chilling.
- Leilah McCracken
Re: checking for a nuchal cord [Issue 4:30]. I do not routinely check for a nuchal cord after birth of the head. If the baby does not restitute, or if the delivery of the head was much slower than expected, I will check for a cord. I will also check if the shoulders do not deliver with the next contraction after birth of the head. On the other hand, I have never seen any damage (tearing) caused to the mom by checking for a cord. The moms, for the most part, definitely don't like it, though.
- Edie Wells, CPM
I too was surprised to read this outdated and unnecessary step in E-News. It is neither useful nor appreciated by women, and as the midwife said, what if you cut the cord because you checked and found it around the neck and then had a shoulder dystocia to manage? That baby would be better off by far with the cord still intact.
We all learned a variety of outdated/unnecessary procedures in our training such as suctioning on the perineum (only appropriate with thick/gloppy or fresh meconium) or suctioning as an automatic step during neonatal resuscitation. To keep our practice up to date and evidence based, it's important to read from a wide variety of sources. I highly recommend the Association of Radical Midwives' Web site to all midwives, as well as the Association for Improvement in Maternity Services' Web site.
I had a fantastic experience with waterbirth. I had a hospital birth with my first son, and it was nothing short of disastrous. I did manage a vaginal delivery but not without an episiotomy with an extended tear. My second delivery was amazing (home waterbirth). I had no problems whatsoever with postpartum hemorrhage, and I didn't even tear! I recommend this method of birthing.
- -Tina Henry, doula
There is so much conflicting information concerning radiation. When you're not pregnant, at the dentist's office they will tell you their X-rays have such low levels of radiation that you get more radiation while you're out on a sunny day or by flying cross-country. But they advise against X-rays when you're pregnant, to (understandably) avoid unnecessary radiation. If by flying or being out on a sunny day one gets the same amount (or more) radiation than from dental X-rays, then shouldn't we be warning pregnant women not to fly and to stay out of the sun when they can? What about nonpregnant women getting suntans/sunburns on their bellies? Does that radiation get through to ovaries and do any damage?
Know a strong woman? Helping empower one? If you haven't already done so, please forward this issue of Midwifery Today E-News to one or two of your friends or business associates. Thanks so much!
Editor's note: Only letters sent to the E-News official e-mail address, email@example.com, will be considered for inclusion. Letters sent to any other e-mail addresses will not be considered.
The International School of Traditional Midwifery in Ashland Oregon is accepting enrollment for February 2003 classes. Contact us at 541-488-8254 or visit us at www.globalmidwives.org
QUEEN JIN'S HANDBOOK OF PREGNANCY is now available for you. Secrets of raising a wise & healthy child in the womb have spread from ancient China through the Far East & now to mothers & fathers in America. www.northatlanticbooks.com or www.amazon.com 106 pages $14.95
Midwifery Today E-News is published electronically every other Wednesday. We invite your questions, comments and submissions. We'd love to hear from you!
Write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please send submissions in the body of your message and not as attachments.
Click here to subscribe to Midwifery Today E-News.
For all other matters contact Midwifery Today at PO Box 2672-940, Eugene OR 97402
Remember to share this newsletter
Need to subscribe, unsubscribe or otherwise change your E-News subscription?
Then please visit our easy-to-use subscription management page!
On this page you will be able to:
- Subscribe to any of our e-mail newsletters
- Unsubscribe from any of our e-mail newsletters
- Change the version (text or HTML) that you receive
- Change the e-mail address to which newsletters are delivered
If you have difficulty, please send a complete description of the problem, including any error messages, to: email@example.com
Learn even more about birth!
Subscribe to our quarterly print publication, MIDWIFERY TODAY. Mention code 940.
|United States||1 year||$50|
| ||2 years||$95|
|Canada / Mexico||1 year||$60|
| ||2 years||$113|
|Other countries||1 year||$75|
| ||2 years||$143|
Subscribe online: www.midwiferytoday.com/products/Sub.htm
Inquiries: firstname.lastname@example.org or call 800-743-0974
How to order our products mentioned in this issue:
Secure online shopping
We accept Visa and MasterCard at the Midwifery Today Storefront.
Order by postal mail
We accept Visa; MasterCard; and check or money order in U.S. funds.
Midwifery Today, Inc.
PO Box 2672
Eugene, OR 97402, USA
Order by phone or fax
We accept Visa and MasterCard.
Phone (U.S. and Canada; orders only): 1-800-743-0974
Phone (worldwide): +1 541-344-7438
Fax: +1 541-344-1422
E-News subscription questions or problems
Editorial submissions, questions or comments for E-News
Editorial for print magazine
For all other matters
All questions and comments submitted to Midwifery Today E-News become the property of Midwifery Today, Inc. They may be used either in full or as an excerpt, and will be archived on the Midwifery Today Web site.
This publication is presented by Midwifery Today, Inc., for the sole purpose of disseminating general health information for public benefit. The information contained in or provided through this publication is intended for general consumer understanding and education only and is not intended to be, and is not provided as, a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Midwifery Today, Inc., does not assume liability for the use of this information in any jurisdiction or for the contents of any external Internet sites referenced, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advertised in this publication. Always seek the advice of your midwife, physician, nurse or other qualified health care provider before you undergo any treatment or for answers to any questions you may have regarding any medical condition.
The content of E-News is copyrighted by Midwifery Today, Inc., and, occasionally, other rights holders. You may forward E-News by e-mail an unlimited number of times, provided you do not alter the content in any way and that you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. You may print a single copy of each issue of E-News for your own personal, noncommercial use only, provided you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. Any other use of the content is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Midwifery Today, Inc., and any other applicable rights holders.
© 2002 Midwifery Today, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Midwifery Today: Each One Teach One!