|February 2, 2005|
Volume 7, Issue 3
|Midwifery Today E-News|
“Induction of Labor”
|Subscribe • Print Page|
Search Archive • Index
Welcome to Midwifery Today E-News !
Midwifery Today Online Store
Want a lot of good midwifery info at one low price?
Looking for the perfect gift for a beginning or student midwife?
For just $89, you'll receive:
This issue of Midwifery Today E-News is brought to you by:
Look below for more info!
Midwifery Today Conferences
Come to the 2005 Eugene Conference! You'll learn about birth from teachers such as:
Go here for info.
Reclaim the joy of midwifery and birth.
Go here for more information and a complete program.
In This Week’s Issue:
Quote of the Week
"Midwifery is ecologically attuned, involving the wise utilization of resources and respect for the balance of nature."
— Elizabeth Davis
Are you enjoying your free copy of the Midwifery Today E-News?
The Art of Midwifery
If you watch laboring women who don't have a cheering section, they may push a little at the peak of contractions sometimes, but not every time. They are bringing a high head down. When it is time, they have an overwhelming urge to push. Get ready, because she is going to have a baby, ready or not. Not letting mom be in an upright position for fear of causing swelling, as many nurses do, may cause swelling. Try to get mom to be upright, and bargain with nurses about dilation checks. Put mom on the toilet and stall for time.
— Caudia Toms, Midwifery Today Forums
ALL BIRTH PRACTITIONERS: The techniques you've perfected over months and years of practice are valuable lessons for others to learn! Share them with E-News readers by sending them to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Join the Birth Market!
The Birth Market is Midwifery Today's online searchable product and service directory. Here you may rent space as one of our treasured shopkeepers. It is a sweet little market that features shops, schools, and educational products, a wonderful place for new families and birth practitioners to unite, network and learn. Visitors at the Birth Market have direct access to your Web page and/or e-mail address through hotlinks from your ad. Learn more.
Send submissions, inquiries, and responses to newsletter items to: email@example.com.
Research to Remember
The prevalence of low birthweight in the United States showed little improvement during the data-collection period 1993 to 2002, revealing a rate of 7.7%. The prevalence is highest for black infants and lowest for Hispanic infants, when compared among racial and ethnic groups (white, black, Hispanic, Asian). Factors contributing to low birthweight other than race/ethnicity are mother's age, prepregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy and smoking during pregnancy.
— Centers for Disease Control
Please support our advertisers!
Induction of Labor
Postdates, by itself, is not associated with poor pregnancy outcome. Extreme postdates or postdates in conjunction with poor fetal growth or developmental abnormalities does show an increased risk of stillbirth. But if growth restriction and birth defects are removed, there is no statistical increase in risk until a pregnancy reaches 42 weeks and no significant risk until past 43 weeks. The primary "evidence" of a sharp rise in stillbirth after 40 weeks—often misquoted as "double at 42 weeks and triple at 43 weeks"—seems to come from one study based on data collected in 1958 (1). ... Modern statistics show an almost flat rate of stillbirth from 40 weeks to 42, with a slight rise at 43 weeks (all numbers being close to 1/1000) (2).
There is a creeping overreaction in dealing with postdates pregnancies. It is true that stillbirth and fetal distress rates rise more sharply after 43 weeks, but it is also true that less than 10% of babies born at 43 weeks suffer from postmaturity syndrome (more than 90% show no signs). We should react to this rise by monitoring postdate pregnancies carefully and inducing if problems arise. But the rise in problems at 43 weeks does not imply a similar risk at 42 and 41 weeks. Postmaturity syndrome is a continuum. It becomes more likely as weeks progress past the due date but does not start on the due date. And the risks must be compared to the risks of interventions. Induction is not risk free. In addition to the risks of prematurity, induced labors have higher rates of cesarean section, uterine rupture, cord prolapse, meconium aspiration, fetal distress, neonatal jaundice, maternal hemorrhage and even the rare but disastrous amniotic fluid embolism.
Large studies have shown that monitoring pregnancy while waiting for spontaneous labor results in fewer cesareans without any rise in the stillbirth rate. One retrospective study of almost 1800 postterm (past 42 weeks) pregnancies with reliable dates compared this group with a matched group delivering "on time" (between 37 and 41 weeks). Perinatal mortality was similar in both groups (0.56/1000 in the postterm and 0.75/1000 in the on-time group). The rates of meconium, shoulder dystocia and cesarean were almost identical. The rates of fetal distress, instrumental delivery, and low Apgar were actually lower in the postdate group than in the on-time group (3). This is only one of several studies showing postdate pregnancies can be monitored safely until delivery or until indications arise for induction. Even the famous Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group (Hannah) of 1700 postdates women showed no difference in perinatal outcome among women who were monitored past their due date, as compared with those who were induced at term (4).
In some studies, postterm births have shown a higher cesarean rate for suspected fetal distress. However, when a group of researchers conducted a case-matched review of nearly 300 postdates pregnancies, they concluded that the increased rate of obstetric and neonatal interventions "does not appear to be a result of underlying pathology associated with post-term pregnancy." They suggest that "a lower threshold for clinical intervention in pregnancies perceived to be 'at risk' may be a significant contributing factor." In other words, the perceived risk is greater than the actual risk and can become a self-fulfilling prophecy (5)!
When monitoring demonstrates that fetal growth, activity and amniotic fluid levels remain within expected norms, the baby can safely wait for spontaneous labor to begin. Spontaneous labor gives the greatest chance for vaginal birth, even though the baby may be slightly larger than if the mother were induced at 40 weeks.
— Excerpted from "A Timely Birth," by Gail Hart, Midwifery Today Issue 72
Labour Induction Epidemic and Autism Epidemic: Is There a Link?
There are many reasons why further studies about labour induction as a possible risk factor for autism are urgently needed. The first one is that the authors of the oldest studies included in our database came across risks associated with induction, whereas the most recent studies could not take into account this variable. "Labour induction" should be explicitly taken into consideration, because it can be associated either with birth by the vaginal route (with or without intervention such as forceps), or with caesarean birth. Another reason is that the epidemic of autism and the epidemic of induction seem to have developed side by side. Most importantly, a third reason is that the results of recent studies suggest that children with autistic disorder show alterations in their oxytocin system.
The first clues came from a study of midday blood samples from 29 autistic and 30 age-matched normal children, all prepubertal (1). It appeared that the autistic group had significantly lower blood oxytocin levels than the normal group. Oxytocin increased with age in the normal but not the autistic children. These results inspired an in-depth inquiry of the oxytocin system of autistic children. In recent years it has become clear that oxytocin can appear in the brain in several forms. There is the nonapeptide oxytocin (OT) and the "C-terminal extended peptides," which are described together as OT-X. The OT-X represent intermediates of oxytocin synthesis that accumulate due to an incomplete processing machinery. Twenty-eight male children, diagnosed with autistic disorder were compared with 31 age-matched non-psychiatric control children: there was a decrease in blood OT, an increase in OT-X and an increase in the ratio of OT-X/OT in the autistic sample, compared with control subjects (2). In other words autistic children show alterations in the oxytocin system: there are deficits in the processing machinery of oxytocin.
Such findings are of paramount importance at a time when an accumulation of data from animal studies confirm the potent effects of oxytocin (and the parent hormone vasopressin) on social behaviour, communication and rituals. Furthermore we are currently learning that oxytocin brain receptors undergo major changes during development. Among humans, the period surrounding birth is considered a period of dramatic reorganization of central oxytocin binding. We must add that, when reaching a certain degree of maturation, the oxytocin system of the fetus probably participates in the physiological initiation of labour. Artificial induction of labour in general, particularly the use of drips of synthetic oxytocin, create situations that undoubtedly interfere with the development and the reorganization of the oxytocin system in such a critical period. This fact alone is a reason for further epidemiological studies focusing on labour induction as a possible risk factor. It would be useful to know also how autistic children release oxytocin. Oxytocin is more effective when released rhythmically, in a succession of fast pulsations. Today it is not impossible to measure the rhythmicity or pulsatility of oxytocin release.
— Primal Health, by Michel Odent, MD
These books by Michel Odent are available from Midwifery Today:
Please support our advertisers!
Products for Birth Professionals
Please support our advertisers!
HypnoBirthing® Childbirth Education
Become part of the most effective, fastest growing childbirth education program—attend one of our intensive four-day trainings. Calmer, gentler, safer birthing using hypnosis. Fear influences birth—hypnosis is the most effective way to eliminate it.
Web Site Update
Tsunami Reports: Watch our homepage for updates on tsunami relief efforts, including an opportunity to volunteer in the field
Extensive information on accommodations been added to our main page about the Midwifery Today conference in Denmark.
Read these article excerpts from Midwifery Today Issue 72 now online:
I have been dealing with vaginal yeast infections for as long as I can remember! The only thing that ever kept them away was, back in college, to use a douche of thyme infusion combined with a few drops of tea tree oil 3 times per day for 3 weeks. I went without a problem for over a year. I am now 30 weeks pregnant and dealing with vaginal yeast (it's varied in intensity throughout the pregnancy) and I want to know if this same douche would be safe to use while pregnant? Also I am still nursing my toddler. I am so sick of the itching!
Share your thoughts and experience about this topic.
Please support our advertisers!
Become a Birth Doula
Help families create happy memories, one birth at a time. If you have a heart for laboring women and families, train to be a doula. Bring emotional, informational and comfort support to birthing families. Learn hands-on techniques to assist families in birth. DONA-approved doula training March 18–20 in Thousand Oaks, CA.
Question of the Week
Q: I recently had a c-section for twins because twin A was a footling breech. Unfortunately, I had to be put under general anesthesia because my platelet levels were too low to safely have an epidural. Is there any sort of homeopathic or herbal remedy that I might try to build up my platelets? My platelets generally are around 70 and have been that way for years, with 50 being the point where treatment is needed, but 100 is the cutoff to get an epidural. When I have another child, I would like to have a VBAC, but if it doesn't work, I don't want to have to be knocked out again.
SEND YOUR RESPONSE to firstname.lastname@example.org with "Question of the Week" in the subject line. Please indicate the topic of discussion *and the E-News issue number* in the message. Responses to any Question of the Week may be sent to E-News at any time. Write to email@example.com. Please indicate the topic of discussion *and the E-News issue number* in the subject line or in the message.
It has been my experience that preterm labor is a cry for help—a cry from the baby or a cry from the mother. Sometimes a woman is doing too much, and the baby shouts, "Hey mom, take a rest!" In these situations, bed rest is probably a good idea.
But I feel the most important thing we are missing in these cries for help is the absolute necessity for the mom and baby to be pampered. Pregnant women should be treated with the utmost respect and valued for the incredible job they are doing growing their babies. Our culture doesn't recognize this, sadly. Pregnant women should receive the highest quality and most delicious foods—especially towards the end of pregnancy. Massage should be a weekly routine, as well as competent, woman-centered prenatal care (which I think includes care with a chiropractor and/or a cranial sacral therapist). Her dreams should be listened to and her fears addressed.
Where can women get this type of care? Doula? Grandma? Sister? Partner? Neighbors? Friends? Co-workers? The answer is, all of these people. Our society has a duty to its future citizens to create an environment that fosters optimal growth.
Besides the fact that tocolytics have many side effects, the worse thing they offer is a false sense of security. I am not judging women who have taken them to stop preterm labor. What I mean is, the idea that a pill will fix a problem like this is insulting to the woman, and most importantly, ignores the real reason for the cry. It covers up the issue instead of getting to the root of it.
— Ruth Trode, Minneapolis, MN
Editor's Apology: As the result of an e-mail address malfunction, letters to E-News bounced back to their senders during the month of January. If you have written to E-News after January 1 and have received your correspondence back, please try again! The problem is fixed, and we greatly look forward to hearing from you!
I was stunned to see this in the Art of Midwifery section from Gloria Lemay [Issue 7:2]:
"One of the reasons we have so much interference in North American birth right now is that young women are overly dramatic."
I would like to know what evidence Gloria has regarding this statement. This sounds like unsubstantiated opinion and mother-blaming to me. I am disappointed that you published this and spread it further. What were you and Gloria thinking?
— With respect and surprise,
The author replies:
Of course, there are no randomized controlled trials on drama in young women. All one has to do is turn on the TV or sit in a booth at an after school coffee shop. Perhaps young women have always been dramatic, but there were older women to tone them down and teach them priorities, conduct and smart behaviour. Maybe it's not the young women being dramatic but the older women abdicating their responsibility to show them the way. I actually have no idea what is creating this jabbering din in the world but I do know that it doesn't help to have a smooth birth at all, and the evidence I have that things are not working is the 28% nationwide c-section rate. "Being nice and politically correct is not helping one bit either." One of my favourite expressions is "The truth shall set you free, but first it will make you mad."
Editor's Note: Only letters sent to the E-News official e-mail address, firstname.lastname@example.org, will be considered for inclusion. Letters sent to ANY OTHER e-mail addresses will not be considered.
Family Centered Midwifery care in your home with a supportive, experienced birth team including a Certified Nurse Midwife, registered nurse and certified doula. WATERBIRTH. Serving Northern New Jersey. Judy Hagan, CNM; Mary Walker, RN; Sabine Kennon, CD. (973) 983-7560 www.babycatcher.com
Remember to share this newsletter
You may forward it to as many friends and colleagues as you wish—it's free!
Want to stop receiving E-News or change your e-mail address? Or would you like to subscribe? Then please visit our easy-to-use subscription management page.
On this page you will be able to:
If you have difficulty, please send a complete description of the problem, including any error messages, to our newsletter.
Learn even more about birth!
Midwifery Today Magazine - mention code 940 when you subscribe.
E-mail email@example.com or call 1-800-743-0974 to learn how to order.
How to order our products mentioned in this issue:
Secure online shopping
We accept Visa and MasterCard at the Midwifery Today Storefront.
Order by postal mail
We accept Visa; MasterCard; and check or money order in U.S. funds.
Midwifery Today, Inc.
Order by phone or fax
We accept Visa and MasterCard.
Phone (U.S. and Canada; orders only): 1-800-743-0974
Phone (worldwide): +1 541-344-7438
Fax: +1 541-344-1422
E-News subscription questions or problems:
Editorial submissions, questions or comments for E-News:
Editorial for print magazine:
For all other matters:
All questions and comments submitted to Midwifery Today E-News become the property of Midwifery Today, Inc. They may be used either in full or as an excerpt, and will be archived on the Midwifery Today Web site.
Midwifery Today E-News is published electronically every other Wednesday. We invite your questions, comments and submissions. We'd love to hear from you! Write to us at: firstname.lastname@example.org. Please send submissions in the body of your message and not as attachments.
This publication is presented by Midwifery Today, Inc., for the sole purpose of disseminating general health information for public benefit. The information contained in or provided through this publication is intended for general consumer understanding and education only and is not intended to be, and is not provided as, a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Midwifery Today, Inc., does not assume liability for the use of this information in any jurisdiction or for the contents of any external Internet sites referenced, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advertised in this publication. Always seek the advice of your midwife, physician, nurse or other qualified health care provider before you undergo any treatment or for answers to any questions you may have regarding any medical condition.
The content of E-News is copyrighted by Midwifery Today, Inc., and, occasionally, other rights holders. You may forward E-News by e-mail an unlimited number of times, provided you do not alter the content in any way and that you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. You may print a single copy of each issue of E-News for your own personal, noncommercial use only, provided you include all applicable notices and disclaimers. Any other use of the content is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Midwifery Today, Inc., and any other applicable rights holders.
© 2005 Midwifery Today, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Midwifery Today: Each One Teach One!